John Deaton, a prominent voice in the cryptocurrency space, has expressed his views in his campaign for the United States Senate seat in Massachusetts.
In an interview with Generation Infinity, Deaton discussed his opposition to a Federal Reserve-issued central bank digital currency (CBDC) and his focus on regulatory clarity and government accountability.
“If there’s a CBDC that’s used by the government to reduce friction […] with the banking system or something like that, that’s one thing. But a consumer-issued CBDC by the Federal Reserve? No, that’s a hill I’m willing to die on to oppose.”
Related: SEC crypto ‘overreach’ cost small investors $15B: John Deaton
Opposition to a Federal CBDC
Deaton claimed in the interview that a Federal CBDC could replace cash and give the government the ability to monitor — and potentially restrict — how individuals spend their money.
He mentioned Senator Elizabeth Warren’s support for a CBDC, suggesting that it could limit the use of crypto assets like Bitcoin (BTC).
“Senator Warren introduced her bill, that’s a de facto ban on Bitcoin and self-custody of crypto in the United States […] She proposed a Federal Reserve-issued CBDC that really could replace cash.”
Related: Sen. Warren to debate John Deaton, criticizes ‘crypto billionaires’
Accountability concerns
In the interview, Deaton highlighted government accountability and fiscal responsibility, showing his support for term limits for senators and representatives.
He argued that long-term incumbency leads to a lack of fresh ideas and accountability in Washington and criticized former regulators moving quickly to private sector roles.
“You shouldn’t be allowed to be the SEC chairman on Friday, and on Monday, you’re Apollo Group’s adviser […] there should be a three to five statutory gap from being a regulator and then going into a job in that industry.”
Related: Pro-XRP attorney John Deaton wins Republican US Senate primary
Deaton calls for regulator clarity
Aside from opposing Federal CBDCs, Deaton emphasized the need for clear regulations in the crypto industry, pointing out the approach of the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
“When I took on the SEC, on behalf of XRP holders, what I said from the very first writ of mandamus was just say that XRP itself isn’t a security. That’s all you’ve got to do, which is follow the law of 75 years.”
The Senate candidate argued that a lack of regulatory clarity had caused some innovators and companies to avoid the US market, stating that some entrepreneurs had chosen to “exclude the US market” in the last five years.
Magazine: Worldcoin fined again! Crypto store clerk runs off with $500K cash: Asia Express